argumentative essay

Student’s Name
Instructor’s Name
Argumentative Essay
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has long taken a position of giving grants useful in inspiring and directing significant effects to treat, cure, and prevent diseases such as malaria, AIDS, and tuberculosis. The Foundation has majorly targeted the illnesses because of the devastating impacts they have on economies and the health of individuals in sub-Saharan Africa (“Bill Gates: Presentation of James C.”). However, there have been several issues concerning the mismanagement of funds, especially in sub-Saharan Africa. The essence of this paper is to argue concerning the development of responsibility in solving health problems against a backdrop of problematic approaches in the treatment of large-scale problems. Although a plethora of issues exists concerning the management of money from philanthropic causes, a decline of the latter is unthinkable and devoid of the tenable comprehension of assisting human in dire need.
The death of a child in the developing world should be similar to that of a baby in developed nations. Human life is of equal value irrespective of the country of origin (Singer n.p.). Valuing human beings is an incremental task because of the equality of humans. The situation calls for understanding the usefulness of giving without having ulterior motives. Wealthy people might want to give out money to ensure that an unchallenged reputation. However, most of them provide the nations because they challenge people to think of their behaviours. The rich understand that parents in sub-Saharan Africa might lose their children to rotavirus, and the situation motivates them to deploy corrective action in the form of giving. None of these persons expect to be rewarded at any point in their lives because they understand the quality of human life and the essence of its preservation.
Rich people give out of abundance and the need to save human lives. Bill Gates and Warren Buffett pledged to give $35 billion and $31 billion in 2006, which was more than the gross domestic product of 70% of the nation’s in the world (Piller, Sanders, and Dixon n.p.). The Gates Foundation invests 5% of its wealth every year to avoid paying most of the taxis in the United States. It granted about $1.4 billion in 2005 to help support different health initiatives globally. Ninety-five percent of the wealth undergoes investment in ensuring that they would be continued funding of programs and making of grants. Such investments have justification despite investing in companies that have failed tests of social responsibility because of unethical practices and disregard for the rights of workers as well as employment discrimination and environmental lapses. The definitive objective is to improve health in the world by ensuring that drugs reach places where they are needed the most.
Corporate philanthropy has been on the decline, with most companies opting to exploit customers and make a profit. Corporate giving had dropped by over 50% over the last 15 years before Porter and Kramer wrote their article in 2002 (n.p.). The researchers point out that executives find themselves in an awkward position with investors demanding short-term profit maximization and critics compelling them to improve levels of corporate social responsibility. Companies that donate significant amounts of money are easy to critique because society expects them to become socially responsible and donate additional funds. Most of the donations do not benefit company executives, and such situations may leave executives in hard positions when attempting to explain to investors. Companies have had to strategize their philanthropic activities to ensure that they do not lose money without becoming profitable in the market.
Rich people determine the type of social transformation they want to engineer in society. Therefore, these persons design and fund projects that can help them implement they are objectives (Barkan n.p.). While it may seemingly venture capital, the primary aim is to transform society in a way that enables people to lead better lives. An example case giving donations to community health care workers in Africa who lack basic amenities (“Everything is fine”). Getting basic amenities in most parts of Africa is a challenge, especially for medical care providers. They find it a difficult task to cater to the needs of patients, such as those suffering from terminal illnesses like malaria and tuberculosis. Each of these persons requires prompt medical attention to avoid imminent death. The situation calls for monetary resources useful in ensuring that none of these people died from treatable or preventable diseases. The motives of each of the philanthropists might be different, but the definitive result is to assist various persons in society.
A significant problem with the contributions from the Gates Foundation has been the demand for highly paid and specially trained medical caregivers. The situation has culminated in the diversion from primary care, which has also employed the abandonment of child survivors from parents will HIV and AIDS. The definitive objective of healing individuals has become hard to justify because diseases such as asphyxia, diarrhea, and birth sepsis have been killing children in sub-Saharan Africa because of the shortage of medical professionals. Programs concerning vaccination have given instructions to caregivers to discourage or ignore patients that discuss elements that are hard to prevent. The situation has meant that the Geneva-based GAVI and the Global Fund have failed to present expected advantages to various persons in sub-Saharan Africa (Piller and Smith n.p.). The organizations have priorities far removed from preventing diseases from spreading in populations in Africa.
People need to become philanthropists whenever possible through innovation and collaboration. The scarcity of money does not imply that they cannot make necessary improvements in the lives of those in need (Fulton). People need education concerning various problems they face, such as malaria (Gates). They also need money to fund various programs that can help them achieve perfect health. With over 120 million Africans living on the edge of emergency due to hunger, philanthropy can become relevant in helping avert any significant issues (Wakabi 161). The primary objective is to deploy sustainability in philanthropy (WHO). Sustainability is attainable through opening up about goals and plans concerning philanthropy (Hess 2). The situation calls for collaboration and understanding of foundations such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, as well as the role it has played in helping spread the goodness of philanthropy.
In conclusion, all humans are similar, which means that children in Africa require treatment of common issues like asphyxia. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has been donating funds to various organizations around the world to help cure and prevent human diseases. The money stream is critical in assisting numerous individuals in sub-Saharan Africa to maintain perfect health. Despite the existence of a few cases of the mismanagement of funds, the philanthropy of individuals such as Bill Gates is pivotal in a world where corporate profitability transcends human suffering.

Works Cited
“Bill Gates: Presentation Of James C. Morgan Global Humanitarian Award – Stories”. Stories, 2019, Accessed 2 Dec 2019.
“Watch “Everything’s Fine” Full Documentary Online Free | Snagfilms”. Snagfilms.Com, 2019, Accessed 2 Dec 2019.
“WHO | In Search Of A Sustainable Philanthropy”. Who.Int, 2019, Accessed 2 Dec 2019.
Barkan, Joanne. “Got Dough? How Billionaires Rule Our Schools”. Dissentmagazine.Org, 2019, Accessed 2 Dec 2019.
E. Porter, Michael, and Mark R. Kramer. “The Competitive Advantage Of Corporate Philanthropy”. HBR.Org, 2019, Accessed 2 Dec 2019.
Fulton, Katherine. “You Are The Future Of Philanthropy”. Ted.Com, 2019, Accessed 2 Dec 2019.
Gates, Bill. “Mosquitos, Malaria And Education”. Ted.Com, 2019, Accessed 2 Dec 2019.
Hess, Frederick M. “Philanthropy gets in the ring: Edu-funders get serious about education policy.” Phi Delta Kappan 93.8 (2012): 17-21.